|
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
|
|
1
|
+Nominatim geocoding ...
|
|
2
|
+388 out of 421 cities were geocoded successfully (92%).
|
|
3
|
+Google geocoding ...
|
|
4
|
+399 out of 421 cities were geocoded successfully (94%).
|
|
5
|
+MapQuest geocoding ...
|
|
6
|
+368 out of 421 cities were geocoded successfully (87%).
|
|
7
|
+HERE geocoding ...
|
|
8
|
+384 out of 421 cities were geocoded successfully (91%).
|
|
9
|
+OpenCage geocoding ...
|
|
10
|
+390 out of 421 cities were geocoded successfully (92%).
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
13
|
+| | success rate / no. of outliers / ping (ms)
|
|
14
|
+|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------
|
|
15
|
+| Nominatim | 92.14% / 14 / 597
|
|
16
|
+| Google | 94.76% / 183 / 601
|
|
17
|
+| MapQuest | 87.38% / 7 / 613
|
|
18
|
+| HERE | 91.19% / 111 / 406
|
|
19
|
+| OpenCage | 92.62% / 4 / 523
|
|
20
|
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
21
|
+| Processed 421 datapoints, 343 were used for outlier calculation (81.47%).
|
|
22
|
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+Outliers written to: outliers.txt
|
|
25
|
+CSV output written to: cities.csv
|
|
26
|
+
|